Skip to content Skip to footer

Student clubs at Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington are funded in part by money collected from students through the Student Services Levy. Every fee-paying student therefore has a stake in how club funding is allocated, what activities are supported, and whether the system is working fairly.

This is a searchable record of VUW club funding grants. You can filter by club, applicant type, panel recommendation and year, then sort by amount or date to see which clubs received support, what was funded, and how much was approved.

Search the club funding database

How VUW club funding works

Clubs apply to the University’s club funding process for support with events, equipment, travel and other activities. Applications are assessed and given a pre-panel recommendation, then a panel decides the final amount approved. The money comes from the Student Services Levy, a compulsory fee paid by every enrolled student.

Common questions

Where does this data come from?

It comes from club funding records released by the University and reproduced here in full. The source document is linked at the bottom of this page.

Why does the recommended amount sometimes differ from the amount approved?

The recommendation is made before the panel meets. The panel can approve more, less, or nothing at all, often after considering budgets or supporting documents supplied later in the process.

My club’s grant looks wrong. Can it be corrected?

Yes. Get in touch and we will check the entry against the source document and correct it if needed.

Disclaimer

The data shown here covers grants approved through the University’s club funding process, administered by the Clubs team and funded from the Student Services Levy. It includes applicant type, club name, event or activity, funding recommendation, recommended funding, and the final amount approved.

This page is not an official University publication. It has been prepared by Save Our Clubs to make club funding information easier to browse, search, and compare. While care has been taken when presenting the information, the original decision-making context may not be fully captured in the data shown here.

Some entries may appear incomplete or may not tell the full story. For example, the amount requested or activity cost may reflect only the initial information provided by a club, while the final decision may have also considered supporting documents, updated budgets, or additional context supplied later in the process.

The “Recommended funding” and “Recommendation” fields generally reflect pre-panel recommendations. These may be blank where no recommendation was recorded. The “Amount approved” field reflects the final amount approved by the panel, which may differ from the recommendation.